Hello, I'm
Dr.
Jessica A.
Blayney
Researcher & Clinician at the Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors
Researcher & Clinician at the Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors
I’m a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washington. Currently, I’m funded by a Pathway to Independence Award.
My research and clinical interests aim to understand the risks for and consequences of sexual victimization. More specifically, I’m interested in how social contexts influence sexual victimization risk as well as variation in post-victimization recovery, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, and sexual risk behaviors.
My work also includes translating social science research into technology-based interventions for adolescents and young women. I have expertise in user experience (UX) design and am a certified UX practitioner with specialization in user research.
In my free time, I enjoy photography, hiking, and being outdoors.
Inspired by my mother’s work in natural disaster preparedness and response, I structured my undergraduate research experiences to learn more about trauma. After graduation, I worked at the Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors where my research interests focused on sexual victimization, distress, and alcohol use. To deepen my understanding of these topics, I collaborated on publications examining alcohol and sexual risk behaviors, the college drinking environment, and trauma recovery. These experiences allowed me to refine my research interests, and as I prepared for graduate school, I looked for programs where I could develop as an alcohol and sexual victimization researcher.
College students who have experienced sexual victimization report heavier and more frequent drinking. My early graduate research examined the longer term impact of sexual victimization as students began to transition out of college (Blayney, Colder, & Read, 2016; Blayney, Scalco, Radomski, Colder, & Read, 2019). Most young adults show a pattern of gradual decline in alcohol use during this transition, yet it was unclear if students who experienced sexual victimization would too. Findings revealed that alcohol use and consequences did decrease for students with sexual victimization histories, but those who reported revictimization remained at higher risk.
My early research also explored how aspects of the sexual victimization incident itself influence post-victimization recovery (Blayney & Read, 2018; Blayney, Hequembourg, & Livingston, 2021). Findings revealed that trauma severity impacts how a person makes sense of the experience and is linked to greater distress and alcohol use over time. Socio-environmental context (e.g., intoxication, relationship with the perpetrator) also influence distress – both immediately following and years later.
My later graduate research explored how social contexts influence sexual victimization risk (Blayney, Jaffe, Carroll, & Read, 2021). This included understanding college women’s perceptions of risk in social contexts and the role that friend groups play responding to risk (Blayney, Jenzer, Read, Livingston, & Testa, 2018).
College women rely on friends when navigating social contexts by using a number of friends-based protective strategies, including keeping tabs on each other, using signals to convey potential danger, taking responsibility for friends, interrupting escalating situations, and drawing on male friends to reduce risk (Blayney, Jenzer, Read, Livingston, Testa, & Carroll, 2020). Friends-based strategies are often used in response to lower severity incidents like unwanted sexual attention or sexual touching (Blayney, Jenzer, Jaffe, Carroll, & Read, 2022).
These strategies, however, are not without barriers, as college women indicate that intoxication, preoccupation, situation ambiguity, and social consequences can easily derail strategy use within friend groups (Blayney, Jenzer, Read, Livingston, Testa & Carroll, 2021).
My current work involves translating basic social science research into theory-informed technology-based interventions for adolescents and young women. These interventions are sex positive and focus on information, motivation building, and skills training to empower young women to take charge of their sexual health.
Within my studies, I take a mixed methods approach to learn more about the experiences of the women I work with. These young women also have the opportunity to provide feedback on the content, design, and delivery of the interventions being developed. Following development, the interventions will be pilot tested for feasibility and acceptability before moving on to large scale randomized controlled trials.
As part of these studies, I draw on user centered design, an innovative approach from the technology sector, which incorporates the target population into all stages of intervention development. Without user involvement, we run the risk of developing interventions that won’t be used. To learn more about user centered design, check out my UX design page.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Anna Jaffe, Quinn Carroll, & Jennifer Read
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston, Maria Testa, & Quinn Carroll
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Matthew Scalco, Sharon Radomski, Craig Colder, & Jennifer Read
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Amy Hequembourg, & Jennifer Livingston
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston & Maria Testa
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Melissa Lewis, Debra Kaysen & Jennifer Read
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Anna Jaffe, Quinn Carroll, & Jennifer Read
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston, Maria Testa, & Quinn Carroll
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Matthew Scalco, Sharon Radomski, Craig Colder, & Jennifer Read
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Amy Hequembourg, & Jennifer Livingston
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston & Maria Testa
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Melissa Lewis, Debra Kaysen & Jennifer Read
Journal of Violence
Objective: Nonconsensual sexual experiences are common in college and freshmen year represents a high-risk time. Social contexts have been linked to nonconsensual sexual experiences, though it is unclear how or why these contexts confer risk. Routine Activity Theories posit that risk increases in contexts where there are potential perpetrators, vulnerable targets, and a lack of capable guardians. A small literature has applied Routine Activity Theories to college women’s nonconsensual sexual experiences, with a focus on between-person differences. The present study sought to expand this work by examining both between- and within-person variation in contextual risk as predictors of nonconsensual sexual experiences over time.
Method: First year college women who drink alcohol (N = 132) participated in a lab session and eight weeks of daily weekend surveys.
Results: On nights where nonconsensual sexual experiences occurred, unwanted sexual attention and touching were common. Perpetrators were typically strangers or casual acquaintances and most incidents involved parties and alcohol. Both between- and within-person variation in contextual risk increased nonconsensual sexual experiences. Greater between-person differences in exposure to potential perpetrators, but not target vulnerability or lack of capable guardians, increased these odds during the study. Further, nights where first year college women reported more exposure to potential perpetrators and more target vulnerability than usual were associated with greater odds that night.
Conclusions: Results illustrate how risk can accumulate in weekend social contexts and suggest that interventions could include targeted approaches for high risk individuals, but also more universal approaches for high risk contexts.
Violence Against Women
Objective: Sexual victimization (SV) risk can begin in social contexts, ones where friends are present, though it is unclear how friends might be integrated into SV prevention.
Method: Using focus groups, female college drinkers described (a) the role of friends in preventing SV, (b) the strategies friends use to reduce vulnerability, and (c) the barriers to implementation.
Results: Friends-based strategies (keeping tabs on one another, using signals to convey potential danger, interrupting escalating situations, taking responsibility for friends, relying on male friends) and barriers (intoxication, preoccupation, situation ambiguity, social consequences) were discussed.
Conclusions: Interventions can draw on these strategies, but must address the critical barriers.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston, Maria Testa, & Quinn Carroll
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Objective: The college years are a period of peak vulnerability for sexual victimization (SV) and substance misuse. During college, students with SV histories report riskier substance use patterns, yet little is known about the influence of SV on substance use behaviors as students begin to transition away from the college environment. This was the purpose of the present study.
Method: College seniors (N = 480; 61% female) reported on their alcohol and drug use behaviors across 5 time points spanning 1 calendar year. For many, this year included the transition out of college.
Results: Latent growth curve analysis was used to determine whether trajectories for alcohol and drug use as well as alcohol and drug consequences differed based on SV histories (no SV, precollege SV, college SV, precollege + college SV). Results revealed that at the start of senior year, young adults with SV histories reported greater substance use and consequences relative to nonvictimized peers. Over the year, SV histories were associated with steeper declines in substance use and consequences. Despite the declines, those who were revictimized across developmental time periods (precollege + college SV) consistently reported higher alcohol use and consequences across the transitional year, although this did not replicate for other drugs.
Conclusions: In sum, although alcohol and other drug involvement among those with SV histories decreased over time, precollege + college SV histories continued to be a persistent risk factor for heavier alcohol use behaviors.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Matthew Scalco, Sharon Radomski, Craig Colder, & Jennifer Read
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Objective: Adult sexual assault (ASA) has been linked to numerous negative psychological and behavioral outcomes. Recent research suggests that post-assault adaptation may differ based on how the victim conceptualizes their ASA. For instance, women who label their rape experiences as such (i.e., acknowledged rape victims) report worse mental health symptoms than women who do not (i.e., unacknowledged rape victims). To date, this literature has focused exclusively on heterosexual women. Relative to heterosexuals, sexual minority women (SMW) are at greater risk for sexual assault and report worse post-assault outcomes, yet little is known about rape acknowledgment in this at-risk population. Moreover, it is unclear how distal factors, such as childhood sexual abuse (CSA), may influence SMW’s rape acknowledgment following ASA.
Method: A total of 205 self-identified lesbian and bisexual women were categorized into four groups (no ASA, ASA that did not involve rape, rape acknowledged, rape unacknowledged) and compared across mental health and drinking outcomes.
Results: Roughly, 42% of the sample experienced rape, and of those, 60% were acknowledged rape victims. Results revealed no statistical differences between acknowledged and unacknowledged rape victims in terms of mental health or alcohol use. However, relative to comparison groups, SMW who were acknowledged rape victims reported greater mental health symptoms, and both acknowledged and unacknowledged rape victims reported greater hazardous drinking. Among SMW with rape histories, greater CSA severity increased the probability of acknowledging rape.
Conclusions: These findings provide valuable information regarding SMW’s post-assault adaptation and can contribute to interventions to assist SMW who experience sexual assault.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Amy Hequembourg, & Jennifer Livingston
Journal of American Health
Objective: The Circle of Six (Co6) phone application (app), winner of the White House’s Apps Against Abuse Challenge, seeks to incorporate friends into sexual victimization risk reduction. Despite its growing presence on college campuses, the feasibility/acceptability of the app to college women is unknown. This mixed methods study sought to fill this gap.
Method: College women (n = 44) participated in summer/fall 2015. Participants completed questionnaires, used the Co6 app for 2 months, and returned to report their experiences.
Results: Consistent with the app’s aim, women reported greater intentions to help friends versus strangers in sexually aggressive situations. However, app use was low over follow-up. Reasons women gave for not using the app included redundancy with existing smart phone features and discomfort with group messaging. Some saw the app as an emergency only resource.
Conclusions: The Co6 app may not meet the real world needs of college women.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston & Maria Testa
Journal of American College Health
Objective: Hooking up is common in college, and has been linked to heavy drinking. Hookups have positive as well as negative consequences, and thus the motivations for hooking up are complex. Yet, little research has focused on these motivations. The present study examined the role that gender and drinking patterns play in the relationship between sexual motivation and penetrative hookups.
Method: Heavy drinking college students (N = 396) completed online surveys between September/October 2009. Method: Sexual motivation, alcohol, and hooking up were assessed.
Results: Enhancement motives and drinking frequency predicted more frequent oral and vaginal sex when hooking up, while peer and partner motives predicted anal sex. Men endorsed greater enhancement motives, peer motives, and hookup oral and vaginal sex. For men, coping motives predicted oral and vaginal sex and peer motives predicted anal sex.
Conclusions: Results provide greater insight into the reasons why college students engage in penetrative hookups.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Melissa Lewis, Debra Kaysen & Jennifer Read
Objective: Nonconsensual sexual experiences are common in college and freshmen year represents a high-risk time. Social contexts have been linked to nonconsensual sexual experiences, though it is unclear how or why these contexts confer risk. Routine Activity Theories posit that risk increases in contexts where there are potential perpetrators, vulnerable targets, and a lack of capable guardians. A small literature has applied Routine Activity Theories to college women’s nonconsensual sexual experiences, with a focus on between-person differences. The present study sought to expand this work by examining both between- and within-person variation in contextual risk as predictors of nonconsensual sexual experiences over time.
Method: First year college women who drink alcohol (N = 132) participated in a lab session and eight weeks of daily weekend surveys.
Results: On nights where nonconsensual sexual experiences occurred, unwanted sexual attention and touching were common. Perpetrators were typically strangers or casual acquaintances and most incidents involved parties and alcohol. Both between- and within-person variation in contextual risk increased nonconsensual sexual experiences. Greater between-person differences in exposure to potential perpetrators, but not target vulnerability or lack of capable guardians, increased these odds during the study. Further, nights where first year college women reported more exposure to potential perpetrators and more target vulnerability than usual were associated with greater odds that night.
Conclusions: Results illustrate how risk can accumulate in weekend social contexts and suggest that interventions could include targeted approaches for high risk individuals, but also more universal approaches for high risk contexts.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Anna Jaffe, Quinn Carroll, & Jennifer Read
Objective: Sexual victimization (SV) risk can begin in social contexts, ones where friends are present, though it is unclear how friends might be integrated into SV prevention.
Method: Using focus groups, female college drinkers described (a) the role of friends in preventing SV, (b) the strategies friends use to reduce vulnerability, and (c) the barriers to implementation.
Results: Friends-based strategies (keeping tabs on one another, using signals to convey potential danger, interrupting escalating situations, taking responsibility for friends, relying on male friends) and barriers (intoxication, preoccupation, situation ambiguity, social consequences) were discussed.
Conclusions: Interventions can draw on these strategies, but must address the critical barriers.
Authors:
Jessica Blayney, Tiffany Jenzer, Jennifer Read, Jennifer Livingston, Maria Testa, & Quinn Carroll